By Frances Collins
12/08/2016
  1. Home
  2. Insights
  3. Article

Rebrands gone wrong

Within the wider category of failed rebrands most can be placed into two distinct categories. The first unsuitable branding and the second poor design ¹. Both are obviously highly subjective so we tend to have to rely on general consensus as to which category a rebrand would fit into.

Failed rebrands - why they are classed as a failure. Old and new mastercard logos

Mastercard rebranded in 2006 alongside a slight change in business direction – with the business communicating their values of advancing relationships, insight and commerce more prominently. The core of the rebrand process however excluded audience consideration and was driven by board-level business decisions. This approach can often work in the branding process as a whole – especially with start-ups – but can have a negative effect during a rebrand. The result was an outcome that communicated the values, but failed to take into consideration customer loyalty to the current brand.

Failed rebrands – when tone of voice is misunderstood

Another example of a recalled rebrand is Kraft. In 2009 Kraft rebranded its corporate division from a bold, recognisable logo to a generic, bland logo with limited reasoning as to why – the press release stated the new logo clearly delivered [sic] “delicious”. But to many the brand felt more like a stock logo with very little personality.

Failed rebrands - why they are classed as a failure. Old and new kraft logos

When you attend a wedding, you tend to use the invitation design to work out what to wear – lace and a swirly font may indicate a degree of formality, whereas if the invitations are printed on cloth – you may need to bring your wellies! The same is true with consumer interaction with companies – audiences want to know where to set expectations and glean as much information to get to a wise decision.

Kraft Food Group Inc. lost its simplicity as a corporate brand and the rebrand reasoning – to communicate the word ‘delicious’ feeling like an odd choice for a company owning so many other brands.


¹ Take the rebrand for Loughborough University. Attempt one (https://www.change.org/p/loughborough-university-revoke-2015-rebrand) would be considered ‘unsuitable branding’ – a brand that doesn’t connect with its audience. Attempt 2 (and the final logo) would be considered poor design.

Successful rebrands
A closer look at two different successful rebrands; Gumtree and Airbnb delving into some of the reasons why the rebrands have been effective. Using your audience within the process Gumtree…
Frances Collins - 06/04/2016
Does your brand stand out?
There are a certain number of brands that feel totally different to what has come before within their market segment. Innocent Drinks are one of those brands. With a focus…
Frances Collins - 07/08/2014
Is branding manipulative?
Companies spend millions on branding, hoping to increase influence and sales. As consumers we regularly make choices between one brand or another – often reasonable, but sometimes illogical! As a…
Frances Collins - 23/06/2017
Branding for service companies
We all have a story about when we have felt let down by a company – twitter is littered with examples of good and bad customer service, and initial problems…
Frances Collins - 14/05/2014

Get in Touch.